isn't this a contradiction?:
first they would claim that the roads and the schools were built exclusively by preval; and then, they would also claim unwittingly that preval received religiously his orders from aristid? but if the latter is true, then the roads and schools are aristid's orders; and if the the former is true, then preval has always been his own man, therefore the fearful association is dishonest.
what do you stand, you cannot have it both ways?
Posted by Patriotic Sentinel on 2/17/06 1:57 PM
REPLY to Patriotic Sentinel
,
REPLY to topic,
or start NEW Topic
This is a reply to
Msg 2592 regarding topic:
Charles Henry Baker
