they have convicted people on murder without A body..
in mathematics, they prove things indirectly by the method of contraction.
they also prove things with OCCAM'S RASOR.
Sometimes, we cannot prove directly as we can prove indirectly.
not all proofs need be deductive.
there are different levels with deductive being the top. but there are historical proofs, proofs based pn patterns, and statistical likehood and other types of proofs.
in my circles, my arguments on the matter with my text" systematic manipulation" can be considered a tentative proof.
based on the low occurence of variable coincidences.
Reply to: Msg 2422
Topic: Charles Henry Baker
Posted by Patriotic Sentinel on 2/13/06 5:32 PM
REPLY to Patriotic Sentinel,
REPLY to topic,
or start a
NEW Topic
Bookmark it via:
Digg,
del.icio.us,
StumbleUpon,
Google
