| Comment is about this photo |
|
| Click to enlarge |
|
Observer Keen 's reply to Msg 36 Saving Brother Randal From Cybernetic Lynching!
brother pinkett is being lynched on the internet for having asserted his right to an unchallenged victory!
the follwing are examples of my heated exchanges with the lynching mob on the internet: Derni�re �dition par observer keen le Dim 18 D�c � 13:13, �dit� 1 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l�utilisateur Envoyer un message priv�
observer keen
Senior Inscrit le: 17 Ao� 2005
Messages: 257
i am now fighting for his cybernetic liberation!Post� le: Dim 18 D�c � 13:06 R�pondre en citant Editer/Supprimer ce message
dear reality07,
my story is an appropriate response to the demonization of an innocent man who has played by the capitalistic rules and the associated philosophy of ethical egoism, but who has subsequently found himself unfairly penalized for his expressed self-honesty.
i have not racialized the finale, but the racialization is rather reflected by the constancy of outrageously unwarranted accusations from very dishonest individuals with misplaced anger.
firstly, i have not personally accused you of racism; and i also know that such an accusation would generally tend to empower the accused. futhermore, my intellectual maturity would not allow me to argue with ad hominem cliches. secondly, i have simply denounced a significant segment of americans whom i have chosen conveniently to unmask via your pseudo-name_ that it is more than obvious that a significant percentage of the negative comments is racially motivated. why?
... perhaps those apparently chronic sufferers of selective amnesia have already forgotten this, but the following is what was said of kwame by his fierce competitor bill:
Asked whether kwame is ready to lead in the trump organization, Bill, an amazingly aggresive competitor, answered that kwame does not have the leadership skills nor does he have the aggressiveness to succeed in the trump enterprise.
Not many of these individuals who are now reviling randal thought negatively of this comment, it was well received in the spirit of a competive show in spite of the fact that kwame is a havard-graduate with remarkable experiences on wall-street, and that if bill was ever any better, it must have been so only marginally. On the contrary, when maintaining that he does business when rebecca writes about it, a factual reference, randal was subsequently perceived as an arrogant ass. when considered cumulatively, all these nuances become very significant, particularly in a country with a racist history such as ours. analyzed in the context of OCCAM'S RAZOR and MILL'S INDUCTIVE METHOD OF DIFFERENCE, an accusation of racism on the part of trump for his attempted violation of the very fabric of the game is not that irrational. it may be false, but it is not a clear case of compulsive accusation.
why have i related moral inconsistency to the reactions on the net? it is my firm belief that slavery had adversely affected the descendents of slaves and those of masters as understood by their respectively warped psychology. for instance, on one hand, a significant percentage of african-americans would unnecessarily internalize a very pessimistic view of life whereas an equal percentage of european-americans on the other hand would conclude, beyond the comfort of their whiteness, with absurdly obvious moral inconsistency of which they are not even aware. am i wearing a race-shade or i am an ojective analyzer? do i personally think that every time an african-american is fired by a white boss, it is a result of racism? not at all! do i believe that most african-american prisoners are innocent? not at all?
do i believe that the claim that the schools in the black community are deprived of the necessary resources to ensure a well-grounded secondary education? i do not buy this non-sence as an african-american despite the fact that the alloted resources in black schools are generally significantly inferior to those given to white schools; but i still that if indian kids can learn abtract algebra with much fewer resources, then our kids' main obstacle to academic sucess cannot reasonably linked to inadequate ressources; however, to ignore the vestigial effects of more than four centuries of forced servitude in comtemporary america is to embody intellectual dishonesty. Here is a pictoral debunking of your claim of overall equality in the case of randal and rebecca: "while walking down the hall in the trump casinos after having made executive decisions, randal spots a disfunctional slot machine with a stuck lever but the machinist on duty is nowhere to be found. what does he do? he takes off his suit and rolls up his shirt and proceeds to fixing the problem using his skills as an MIT-mechanical engineering graduate.
after repairing the slot machine, the new young excutive, on his way to his office, comes upon a very frustrated cashier starring at a frozen computer. what does he do? he steps her aside and tells her to relax, and uses his skills as an oxford-computer-science graduate to put a smile on the cashier's face with a magically outputting computer-screen; just before he gets into his office, a woman suddenly yells out loud that someone snatches her purse, but the security-guard is nowhere to be found. what does randal do?
he uses his fast legs as a track-star at rutgers university to catch the bastard and retores to the lady a purse which happens to hold objects of irreplacable sentimental value; finally inside his office, randal stumbles upon a fax from a credible source assuring him that the federal government has just legalized online-gambling. what does he do? the young executive sits down and drafts an elaborate plan using insights from his doctoral thesis on digital community intended to generate maximal profits for a currently deficient trump casino."
now, on what logical basis are they to be considered equal if only one of them has all these additional assets?
are we looking through a distorting prism? or are still applying the infamous three-fifth dilation factor used in congressional representation during pre-lincolnian america? Derni�re �dition par observer keen le Dim 18 D�c � 13:33, �dit� 1 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l�utilisateur Envoyer un message priv�
observer keen
Senior Inscrit le: 17 Ao� 2005
Messages: 257
Post� le: Dim 18 D�c � 13:12 R�pondre en citant Editer/Supprimer ce message Supprimer ce message
"randal and rebecca were overall equal", reality 07 dear reality07, perhaps you are using the colonial dilation factor of three-fifth. in others words, you have multiplied randal's competence index by 3/5 and ended up with an overall equality with rebecca's, that is known in kkk-mathematics as the jim-crowan transformation system.
your reality time machine should have transported you back into the other united states where the three-fifth-human-transformation factor was constitutional. i will beam you back reality07 free of charge with my newly built micro-super-energetic-time-reversal machine for which my patent is still pending. in fact, many white americans have been willing to advance their time-reversal travel fares even after i have warned them that the machine is yet to be perfected and it still is in its experimental stages; and that one possible defect of the machine is the following: the reactionary traveler may come back as a southern slave, a defect known as the "karmic anomaly".
sir, your reactions and the like are symptomatic of the moral inconsistency syndrome of white americans, something that is so true but so undermined. moral inconsitency occurs when a significant percentage of individuals of a particular cultural and ethnic group would generally make divergent conclusions for the same exactly situation in perfect one-to-one relationship to the specific colors of the elements involved. had randal been white, he would have been courageous for defying trump rather than classless; had he been white, he would been confident rather than arrogant; had he been white, he would have been assertive rather than egotiscal.
the problem is that european-americans have a tendency to approach non-whites particularly african-africans in a very sujective manner by compartmentalizing them into one big cultural collective figure. that is a significant psychological shortcoming for it prevents the observer from acquiring important details about the individual. haven't you guys realized that the most popular accusation on the net is that of a "con-man"? they have sanctified the man in their usual subjective manner without paying attention to one of the most important aspects of the man, that is his huge ego. the man acquired five degrees before the age of thirty, that is a huge ego, and lot of an healthy one. the prime example of the moral inconsitency of european-americans is to be found in the classic case of southern california vis-a-vis affirmative action. in southern california, the people of a particular county overwhelmingly voted to ban affirmative action for they claimed that the unites states of america are sufficiently meritocratic and that affirmation is unnecessary. affirmative action was banned; but by some strange coincidence, the board of education in california later decided to build a martin luther king public school in a predominantly white section in the same county that had previously and overwhelmingly voted affirmative action out. not suprisingly, the residents vehemently rejected the plan, and when asked why, their reply was the following: "..we do not want our kids to be mistaken for blacks and subsequently treated unfairly when applying for college". i am not of the school that falsely believes that everything that has affected blacks is directly related to slavery; however, i recognize the vestigial effects of colonial thinking in our everyday lives as it is so apparent in our vicious comments about randal for his refusal to share his earned victory. aren't capitalism and the right to dispose of one's earned incomes the cherished ideas of white conservatives? what has suddenly happened to the nobleness of ethical egoism? reality07
Posts: 36 16. Re: Did Bill Hire Kwame? | 12/17/2005 2:52pm keenobserver :
"randal and rebecca were overall equal", reality 07 dear reality07, perhaps you are using the colonial dilation factor of three-fifth. in others words, you have multiplied randal's competence index by 3/5 and ended up with an overall equality with rebecca's, that is known in kkk-mathematics as the jim-crowan transformation system.
your reality time machine should have transported you back into the other united states where the three-fifth-human-transformation factor was constitutional. i will beam you back reality07 free of charge with my newly built micro-super-energetic-time-reversal machine for which my patent is still pending. in fact, many white americans have been willing to advance their time-reversal travel fares even after i have warned them that the machine is yet to be perfected and it still is in its experimental stages; and that one possible defect of the machine is the following: the reactionary traveler may come back as a southern slave, a defect known as the "karmic anomaly".
sir, your reactions and the like are symptomatic of the moral inconsistency syndrome of white americans, something that is so true but so undermined. moral inconsitency occurs when a significant percentage of individuals of a particular cultural and ethnic group would generally make divergent conclusions for the same exactly situation in perfect one-to-one relationship to the specific colors of the elements involved. had randal been white, he would have been courageous for defying trump rather than classless; had he been white, he would been confident rather than arrogant; had he been white, he would have been assertive rather than egotiscal.
the problem is that european-americans have a tendency to approach non-whites particularly african-africans in a very sujective manner by compartmentalizing them into one big cultural collective figure. that is a significant psychological shortcoming for it prevents the observer from acquiring important details about the individual. haven't you guys realized that the most popular accusation on the net is that of a "con-man"? they have sanctified the man in their usual subjective manner without paying attention to one of the most important aspects of the man, that is his huge ego. the man acquired five degrees before the age of thirty, that is a huge ego, and lot of an healthy one. the prime example of the moral inconsitency of european-americans is to be found in the classic case of southern california vis-a-vis affirmative action. in southern california, the people of a particular county overwhelmingly voted to ban affirmative action for they claimed that the unites states of america are sufficiently meritocratic and that affirmation is unnecessary. affirmative action was banned; but by some strange coincidence, the board of education in california later decided to build a martin luther king public school in a predominantly white section in the same county that had previously and overwhelmingly voted affirmative action out. not suprisingly, the residents vehemently rejected the plan, and when asked why, their reply was the following: "..we do not want our kids to be mistaken for blacks and subsequently treated unfairly when applying for college". i am not of the school that falsely believes that everything that has affected blacks is directly related to slavery; however, i recognize the vestigial effects of colonial thinking in our everyday lives as it is so apparent in our vicious comments about randal for his refusal to share his earned victory. aren't capitalism and the right to dispose of one's earned incomes the cherished ideas of white conservatives? what has suddenly happened to the nobleness of ethical egoism? Dear keenobserver, It seems like race plays a large role in your story. Could you please give me a reason why i care if Randal is black or white? Really, you didn't have to write a story about my opinion. YOU are entitled to your opinion as well. MY opinion, is that Rebecca and Randal are equal. Randal may have a better resume but Rebecca has stepped up over the course of weeks many times(with a broken ankle)and has shown Trump something VERY,VERY,VERY, important to him and his organization-loyalty. I DO believe Trump should have hired Rebecca as well. It's obvious he was thinking about it, hence he asked for Randal's opinion. Just think for a moment, Rebecca did a WAY better job on the final task. No one had to make a big deal out of this little talk. reality07
Posts: 36 17. Re: Did Bill Hire Kwame? | 12/17/2005 2:59pm I'm not hating on Randal however I do believe he should have given Rebecca the apprenticeship as well. In fact, Trump shouldn't have even asked Randal do make such a decision and instead hire both. Both are equally great. I just think that was a selfish thing to do. I can see where he was coming from however there is no need to deny anyone, especially Rebecca and especially one who you seemingly have such respect for and a great frienship with, of a position that could alter someone's life. It's not like they chose the same job or anything. He could have made himself look better and strengthen the Trump Organization even more. Rebecca was a valuable candidate and I still cannot believe Randal deprived Rebecca of something she worked equally hard for. I had nothing but great thoughts on Randal but when he made that selfish decision to not induct Rebecca to the organizatioin, my thoughts changed. I am not racist nor do i care what the color of his skin is. eyelovetv
Posts: 2 18. Re: Did Bill Hire Kwame? | 12/17/2005 3:38pm I would have hired Kwame. I would not hire Rebecca. I can't quite figure out how Rebecca made it to the final. But she doesn't come close to being as good as Randall or even Kwame. What Donald did at the end was an unfair way to treat an employee. reality07
Posts: 36 19. Re: Did Bill Hire Kwame? | 12/17/2005 3:42pm eyelovetv :
I would have hired Kwame. I would not hire Rebecca. I can't quite figure out how Rebecca made it to the final. But she doesn't come close to being as good as Randall or even Kwame. What Donald did at the end was an unfair way to treat an employee. I think she made it to the final because she has proven herself to be a loyal, well respected, and overall classy person who can speak and carry herself well. She stepped up despite her broken ankle and Donald just saw something special in her. keenobserver
Posts: 5 20. Re: Did Bill Hire Kwame? | 12/17/2005 6:26pm dear reality07,
my story is an appropriate response to the demonization of an innocent man who has played by the capitalistic rules and the associated philosophy of ethical egoism, but who has subsequently found himself unfairly penalized for his expressed self-honesty.
i have not racialized the finale, but the racialization is rather reflected by the constancy of outrageously unwarranted accusations from very dishonest individuals with misplaced anger.
firstly, i have not personally accused you of racism; and i also know that such an accusation would generally tend to empower the accused. futhermore, my intellectual maturity would not allow me to argue with ad hominem cliches. secondly, i have simply denounced a significant segment of americans whom i have chosen conveniently to unmask via your pseudo-name_ that it is more than obvious that a significant percentage of the negative comments is racially motivated. why?
... perhaps those apparently chronic sufferers of selective amnesia have already forgotten this, but the following is what was said of kwame by his fierce competitor bill:
Asked whether kwame is ready to lead in the trump organization, Bill, an amazingly aggresive competitor, answered that kwame does not have the leadership skills nor does he have the aggressiveness to succeed in the trump enterprise.
Not many of these individuals who are now reviling randal thought negatively of this comment, it was well received in the spirit of a competive show in spite of the fact that kwame is a havard-graduate with remarkable experiences on wall-street, and that if bill was ever any better, it must have been so only marginally. On the contrary, when maintaining that he does business when rebecca writes about it, a factual reference, randal was subsequently perceived as an arrogant ass. when considered cumulatively, all these nuances become very significant, particularly in a country with a racist history such as ours. analyzed in the context of OCCAM'S RAZOR and MILL'S INDUCTIVE METHOD OF DIFFERENCE, an accusation of racism on the part of trump for his attempted violation of the very fabric of the game is not that irrational. it may be false, but it is not a clear case of compulsive accusation.
why have i related moral inconsistency to the reactions on the net? it is my firm belief that slavery had adversely affected the descendents of slaves and those of masters as understood by their respectively warped psychology. for instance, on one hand, a significant percentage of african-americans would unnecessarily internalize a very pessimistic view of life whereas an equal percentage of european-americans on the other hand would conclude, beyond the comfort of their whiteness, with absurdly obvious moral inconsistency of which they are not even aware. am i wearing a race-shade or i am an ojective analyzer? do i personally think that every time an african-american is fired by a white boss, it is a result of racism? not at all! do i believe that most african-american prisoners are innocent? not at all?
do i believe that the claim that the schools in the black community are deprived of the necessary resources to ensure a well-grounded secondary education? i do not buy this non-sence as an african-american despite the fact that the alloted resources in black schools are generally significantly inferior to those given to white schools; but i still that if indian kids can learn abtract algebra with much fewer resources, then our kids' main obstacle to academic sucess cannot reasonably linked to inadequate ressources; however, to ignore the vestigial effects of more than four centuries of forced servitude in comtemporary america is to embody intellectual dishonesty. Here is a pictoral debunking of your claim of overall equality in the case of randal and rebecca: "while walking down the hall in the trump casinos after having made executive decisions, randal spots a disfunctional slot machine with a stuck lever but the machinist on duty is nowhere to be found. what does he do? he takes off his suit and rolls up his shirt and proceeds to fixing the problem using his skills as an MIT-mechanical engineering graduate.
after repairing the slot machine, the new young excutive, on his way to his office, comes upon a very frustrated cashier starring at a frozen computer. what does he do? he steps her aside and tells her to relax, and uses his skills as an oxford-computer-science graduate to put a smile on the cashier's face with a magically outputting computer-screen; just before he gets into his office, a woman suddenly yells out loud that someone snatches her purse, but the security-guard is nowhere to be found. what does randal do?
he uses his fast legs as a track-star at rutgers university to catch the bastard and retores to the lady a purse which happens to hold objects of irreplacable sentimental value; finally inside his office, randal stumbles upon a fax from a credible source assuring him that the federal government has just legalized online-gambling. what does he do? the young executive sits down and drafts an elaborate plan using insights from his doctoral thesis on digital community intended to generate maximal profits for a currently deficient trump casino."
now, on what logical basis are they to be considered equal if only one of them has all these additional assets?
are we looking through a distorting prism? or do we use transformation systems of which we are unaware?
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l�utilisateur Envoyer un message priv�
randal pinckett is being lynched on the internet! Voir le sujet pr�c�dent Voir le sujet suivant Revenir en haut
Page 1 sur 1
Surveiller les r�ponses de ce sujet
Permission de ce forum: Vous pouvez r�pondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Quel Avenir pour Lavalas? :: HAITI: Politique - Crise - Elections :: -
Page 1 sur 1
Surveiller les r�ponses de ce sujet
Quel Avenir pour Lavalas? :: HAITI: Politique - Crise - Elections :: +
Poster un nouveau sujet R�pondre au sujet Sauter vers:
| 
